Background
Basic concepts
equivalences in/of -categories
Universal constructions
Local presentation
Theorems
Extra stuff, structure, properties
Models
homotopy theory, (∞,1)-category theory, homotopy type theory
flavors: stable, equivariant, rational, p-adic, proper, geometric, cohesive, directed…
models: topological, simplicial, localic, …
see also algebraic topology
Introductions
Definitions
Paths and cylinders
Homotopy groups
Basic facts
Theorems
The homotopy category of an (∞,1)-category is its decategorification to an ordinary category obtained by identifying 1-morphisms that are connected by a 2-morphism.
If the (∞,1)-category is presented by a category with weak equivalences (for instance as the simplicial localization ) then the notion of homotopy category of (where the weak equivalences are universally turned into isomorphisms) coinicides with that of :
The component-wise definition depend on the chosen model for -categories, as either
The homotopy category of a sSet-enriched category (equivalently of a Top-enriched category) is hom-wise the image under the functor
which sends each simplicial set to its 0th homotopy set of connected components, i.e. to the set of path components:
Sometimes it is useful to regard this after all as an enriched category, but now enriched over the homotopy category of the standard model structure on simplicial sets , which is the homotopy category of an -category of ∞Grpd.
Let be the localization functor to the homotopy category (of a category with weak equivalences). This functor is a monoidal functor by the fact that the cartesian monoidal product is a left-Quillen bifunctor for , which means that since every object in is cofibrant, it preserves weak equivalences in both arguments and hence descends to the homotopy category
This inuces a canonical functor which is given by the identity on objects and: . Then since , it is easy to see that .
Similar, but more complicated, definitions work for complete Segal spaces and Segal categories.
For quasi-categories, one can write down a definition similar to those of -enriched categories.
Viewing as a simplicial set, the homotopy category can also be described as its fundamental category , i.e. the image of by the left adjoint of the nerve functor .
The Brown representability theorem characterizes representable functors on homotopy categories of -categories:
Let be a locally presentable (∞,1)-category, generated by a set
of compact objects (i.e. every object of is an (∞,1)-colimit of the objects .)
If each admits the structure of a cogroup object in the homotopy category , then a functor
(from the opposite of the homotopy category of to Set)
is representable precisely if it satisfies these two conditions:
sends small coproducts to products;
sends (∞,1)-pushouts to epimorphisms, i.e. the canonical morphisms into the fiber product
are surjections.
(Lurie “Higher Algebra”, theorem 1.4.1.2)
Jacob Lurie, section 1.4.1 of Higher Algebra
Last revised on August 16, 2017 at 16:21:38. See the history of this page for a list of all contributions to it.